ReviewThe New phytologist2026
Forest canopy interactions with aerosols: important considerations in approaching future impacts and climate management.
Review in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding plant volatile stress signals across scales: from molecular responses to ecosystem dynamics.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aerosols influence forest ecosystems through changes in radiation and climate affecting plant physiology and structure. Conversely, forests also contribute to aerosol formation. They emit primary aerosol particles and volatile organic compounds, which promote secondary organic aerosol formation in the atmosphere. This forest-aerosol coupling is highly dynamic, influenced by temperature, radiation, humidity, and trace gases. Wildfires add further complexity via smoke plumes altering radiation and ecosystem functioning, tropospheric ozone levels and stratospheric chemistry. Aerosols modify the quantity, directionality, and composition of solar radiation. The type of diffuse light produced by aerosol particles is however strongly dissimilar to the one produced under clouds, and the relevance of the traditional diffuse/direct binary paradigm is discussed. Therefore, potential benefits from increased diffuse radiation are contingent on aerosol load, canopy structure, and prevailing environmental conditions. Beyond photosynthetic responses, aerosols alter forest water-use efficiency and microclimate, yet their long-term effects on plant development, architecture, and community composition remain poorly understood. This review highlights significant knowledge gaps and recent advances in understanding aerosol-forest interactions across temporal and spatial scales. We underline the urgent need for improved experiments with realistic diffuse shading, extensive in situ observations, mechanistic model intercomparison, and global validation to guide future research and policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.