Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069099›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2025

Changes in office-hours doctor and nurse consultations: six-year register-based follow-up cohort study in the public primary health care of City of Vantaa, Finland.

Katri Mustonen, Marko Raina, Timo Kauppila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katri MustonenDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7709-4792
Marko RainaWellbeing Services County of Vantaa and Kerava, Vantaa, Finland.
Timo KauppilaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate how the number of face-to-face office-hours nurse consultations changed in response to the continuously decreasing number of consultations with general practitioners (GPs) in the fourth largest city in Finland, Vantaa we performed a retrospective register-based follow-up cohort study in public primary health care. The number of monthly consultations per practitioner in public primary health care were examined and counted from all recorded face-to-face office-hour consultations with GPs, practical nurses (PNs), registered nurses (RNs), and public health (PHNs) nurses of Vantaa's public primary health care system between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014. Over the follow-up period, the monthly mean number of GP consultations adjusted per practitioner decreased from 159 (mean; SD 29) in 2009 to 135 (16) in 2014 (p<0.001), and the number of RN consultations decreased from 34 (14) to 27 (7; p<0.001). There was no significant decrease in the practitioner-adjusted median monthly number of office-hour consultations with PN or PHN. The total number of monthly office-hour consultations per practitioner decreased from 40 (11) to 34 (6; p<0.001). In public office-hours PHC, face-to-face medical consultations have not automatically shifted from GPs to nurses. Surprisingly, recorded RN consultations may even decrease, and the overall productivity of PHC may worsen.

Indexed as

General PractitionersNursesOffice VisitsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesGeneral practitionernurse consultationsoffice-hour careprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID41069099
PMCPMC12517405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.