ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2025
A Nationwide Survey by the Korean Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (KSOPRS) on the Management of Thyroid Eye Disease in South Korea.
Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Korean Clinical Practice Framework for Thyroid Eye Disease: Integrating International Recommendations with Survey-Informed Consensus.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate current diagnostic and therapeutic practices among South Korean oculoplastic surgeons, with particular focus on adherence to guidelines and perspectives on emerging therapies such as teprotumumab.
methodsA nationwide, anonymized online survey was conducted in May 2025 among members of the Korean Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (KSOPRS). The questionnaire collected data on physician demographics, diagnostic and monitoring approaches, therapeutic strategies for mild and moderate-to-severe thyroid eye disease (TED), management of dysthyroid optic neuropathy, and perspectives on teprotumumab treatment.
resultsThirty-two physicians participated in the study, most of whom practiced at tertiary centers. Most respondents (n = 28, 87.5%) utilized the Clinical Activity Score and the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy severity classification. Intravenous (IV) glucocorticoid (GC) therapy was the predominant treatment for moderate-to-severe TED (n = 31, 96.9%), with adjunctive use of oral GCs, immunosuppressants (n = 13, 40.6%), and orbital radiotherapy (n = 29, 90.6%). In managing dysthyroid optic neuropathy, 19 respondents (59.4%) employed IV GC with radiotherapy, and 29 (90.6%) recommended decompression for refractory cases. Teprotumumab was considered primarily for GC-refractory cases, although its use was limited owing to cost and limited clinical experience. Functional assessments, including visual acuity and relative afferent pupillary defect, were prioritized over structural imaging in evaluating treatment response.
conclusionsSouth Korean oculoplastic surgeons generally follow international TED guidelines, favoring IV GC and conventional therapies over biologics due to access and cost barriers. As biologics like teprotumumab become more accessible, region-specific guidelines integrating global evidence and local healthcare constraints will be critical for optimized patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.