SynthesisBMC psychology2025
Couples' therapies can improve clinical outcomes of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder: meta-analysis of eighteen clinical studies.
Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPartners play an important role in a couple's life, and the whole family may face various challenges when meeting post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effect of couples' therapies for PTSD.
methodsThis study obtained relevant data from databases including Ovid Medline(R) ALL, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and American Psychological Association PsycInfo until July 03, 2025.
resultsThe couples' therapies showed an adherence rate (Proportion = 69%, 95%CI: 64% to 73%). Comparing with before couples' therapies, there were significant improvement in for patients (SMD = -0.79, 95%CI: -1.13 to -0.46) and for partners (SMD = -0.78, 95%CI: -1.05 to -0.52) after therapy, and there were significant improvement in intimate relationship functioning for patients (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.12 to 0.42) and partners (SMD = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.20 to 0.56), and in depression level for patients (SMD = -0.61, 95%CI: -0.82 to -0.40) and partners (SMD = -0.29, 95%CI: -0.50 to -0.07) after couples' therapies. Outcomes included comparisons with subgroup analysis which revealed that PTSD symptoms had better consequence for patients in age < 40 (SMD = -1.04, 95%CI: -1.93 to -0.16), male (SMD = -1.48, 95%CI: -1.95 to -1.01), and sessions ≥ 10 (SMD = -1.14, 95%CI: -1.53 to -0.74), trauma-focused (SMD = -1.17, 95%CI: -1.60 to -0.73), non-military personnel (SMD = -1.37, 95%CI: -1.94 to -0.79) and CBCT (SMD = -0.87, 95%CI: -1.24 to -0.49) had preferable outcomes for in PTSD symptoms.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated the improvement of couples' therapies in PTSD symptoms, intimate relationship functioning and depression level. It was also found that the adherence rate of couples' therapies for PTSD was higher in Males, and the PTSD symptoms showed more conspicuous improvement in patients younger than 40 years of age, males, longer sessions of therapy, trauma-focused and CBCT after couples' therapies.
trial registrationThe protocol of meta-analysis was available at the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/s39jn/ ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.