ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025
The Guideline Uptake in Digital Ecosystems (GUIDE) study: protocol for implementation research on the impact of WHO SMART guidelines digital adaptation kits to improve quality of care.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Localizing WHO SMART guidelines-Digital Adaptation Kits (DAKs) for country impact: implementation insights from Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the potential for digital tools to facilitate guideline uptake, translating paper-based narrative guidelines into digital formats is resource-intensive and may compromise the fidelity to the recommended content. The World Health Organization (WHO) launched the SMART Guidelines initiative, in which digital adaptation kits (DAKs) are a foundational component. DAKs comprise software requirements documentation, including detailed data dictionary and algorithms--derived from WHO guidelines =for encoding within digital systems.
methodsThis implementation research consists of a formative assessment and impact evaluation on integrating DAKs within national digital systems to improve service delivery outcomes for antenatal care (ANC), family planning, and HIV in two countries (Ethiopia and Ghana). The formative phase will assess the requirements to customize the DAKs to align with the national protocols and subsequently incorporate the localized DAKs' content into the respective nationally endorsed digital systems: Bahmni in Ethiopia and DHIS2 tracker in Ghana. The impact evaluation will assess the effect of using the DAK-upgraded digital systems using pre-post designs in Ethiopia and Ghana. Primary outcomes of adherence to guideline recommendations will be assessed when digital systems incorporate country-adapted DAK content in comparison with the existing practice. Guideline knowledge questionnaires and in-depth interviews with software developers, health workers and facility managers will supplement the impact evaluation. DISCUSSION: This research represents one of the first impact evaluations focused on integrating DAKs into existing national digital systems and the effect on service delivery outcomes. The mixed-methods study design will provide learnings for future scale-up and replication across other countries. We expect final results to be available in 2026, and preliminary findings will be shared at relevant fora. Trial registration https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18394724 . Registration date: 21 December 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.