Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068902›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Core outcome domain sets for clinical trials in epidermolysis bullosa - a COSEB protocol to achieve consensus on "what" to measure.

Eva W H Korte, Peter C van den Akker, Dimitra Kiritsi, Jan Kottner, Anna M G Pasmooij, Cecilia A C Prinsen, Verena Wally, Tobias Welponer, Phyllis I Spuls, Martin Laimer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eva W H KorteDepartment of Dermatology, UMCG Center of Expertise for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-5654
Peter C van den AkkerDepartment of Genetics, UMCG Center of Expertise for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-753X
Dimitra KiritsiDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-8981
Jan KottnerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Clinical Nursing Science, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-3818
Anna M G PasmooijDepartment of Dermatology, UMCG Center of Expertise for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0641-3829
Cecilia A C PrinsenCHORD COUSIN Collaboration, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-3788
Verena WallyDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology and EB House Austria, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8705-3890
Tobias WelponerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology and EB House Austria, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-0720
Phyllis I SpulsDepartment of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6035-2863
Martin Laimer *Department of Dermatology and Allergology and EB House Austria, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6932-0374
Maria C Bolling *Department of Dermatology, UMCG Center of Expertise for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.c.bolling@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2086-9363
COSEB Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises a heterogeneous group of rare, genetic blistering diseases. The wide variety in EB trial outcomes limits the comparability of outcomes and, consequently, the implementation of the best available treatment options. A core outcome set (COS) is a minimum set of outcomes that should be measured in all clinical trials, comprising what should be measured (i.e., outcome domains) and how it should be measured (i.e., outcome measurement instruments). This enables standardization of outcome measurement aiming at improving the comparability and quality of research.

methodsThe Core Outcome Set for Epidermolysis Bullosa (COSEB) initiative aims to develop COSs for use in clinical trials for the four major EB types: EB simplex, junctional EB, dystrophic EB, and Kindler EB. This protocol focuses on the development of core outcome domain sets - outlining what should be measured in EB clinical trials. Involved stakeholders are patients and patient representatives, clinicians, researchers, methodologists, industry representatives, regulators, health technology assessors, and payers. In the initial part, working groups are formed to define long lists of candidate outcome domains for the four major EB types. Potentially relevant outcome domains will be identified based on scoping literature reviews and qualitative studies. Following consultations with a stakeholder advisory panel, a short list of candidate outcome domains will be subject to voting in Delphi consensus procedures. Finally, the definitive core outcome domain sets for the four major EB types and, if indicated, any overarching core outcome domain sets, will be confirmed in consensus meetings. The project Has been prospectively registered in the COMET registry for COSs on 23 October 2017 (registration number 1033). DISCUSSION: This protocol provides guidance to ensure a systematic, transparent, and comprehensible approach of COSEB. The final core outcome domain sets are supposed to serve as the minimum sets of what to measure in future EB trials. This will provide the basis for the subsequent outcome measurement instrument selection. Particularly in this rare disease with inherently small-sized study cohorts, this will facilitate the incorporation of meaningful outcomes and pooling of data, ultimately enhancing optimal treatment for EB.

trial registrationThis study Has been prospectively registered in the COMET database on 23 October 2017 and updated on 24 January 2022 (registration number 1033 https://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/1033 ).

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationEpidermolysis BullosaConsensus Statements as TopicDelphi TechniqueHumansResearch DesignStakeholder ParticipationTreatment OutcomeClinical trialCore outcome setEpidermolysis bullosaOutcome measurement

Identifiers

PMID41068902
PMCPMC12512268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.