Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068891›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2025

First initiative to develop a standard methodology for the evaluation of Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits in different settings against targeted mosquito vectors: a methodological review.

Appadurai Daniel Reegan, Sam Joy, Purushotham Jambulingam, Manju Rahi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Appadurai Daniel ReeganICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605 006, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9824-1501
Sam JoyIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, 110 029, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7737-2433
Purushotham JambulingamICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605 006, India.
Manju RahiICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indira Nagar, Puducherry, 605 006, India. drmanjurahi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0932-0935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVector-borne diseases remain a major global health problem, mostly in tropical and subtropical areas. Effective vector control is crucial for controlling vector borne diseases (VBDs). Over the years various vector control tools and strategies have been employed globally. However, the recent challenges including insecticide-resistant, alterations in vector behaviour, and non-target effects have highlighted the need for novel vector control tools and alternate strategies. One such tool is the Attractive Targeted Sugar Baits (ATSBs), which uses the sugar-seeking habit of adult mosquitoes. The ATSB strategy operates on an "attract and kill" approach, where mosquitoes are lured to the bait and to feed on sugar combined with an insecticide. For this, a standard methodology needs to be developed for a uniform evaluation of ATSBs.

resultsThe ATSB vector control strategy has shown promising results in studies carried out in various parts of Africa and the Middle East on controlling populations of mosquito species. Although numerous experiments have been conducted and are ongoing in various countries, there remains a lack of standardized guidelines for evaluating ATSBs. In 2023, the ICMR along with partners drafted the 3rd edition of Common Protocols for evaluating public health vector control products. The revised edition included a trial methodology for ATSB. Taking this into consideration, the phase-wise standard methodology is presented in this review for the uniform evaluation of different formulations/products of ATSBs.

conclusionsThe methodologies, outlined in this article will serve as the standard methodology for testing ATSB formulations/products under laboratory conditions (Phase I), small-phase (Phase II), and large-phase field trial (Phase III) conditions.

Indexed as

InsecticidesMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsSugarsAnimalsInsecticidesSugarsATSBMethodologyProtocolVector control tool

Identifiers

PMID41068891
PMCPMC12509374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.