Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068865›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Impact of the OSCE on anxiety levels and perceptions of dental students: a cross-sectional study.

Aurora Saiz Rodríguez, Ana Antoranz, Gema Cidoncha, Maria Jesús Pardo Monedero, Marta Muñoz-Corcuera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aurora Saiz RodríguezFaculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Dentistry-Pregraduate studies, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Plaza Francisco Morano s/n, Madrid, 28005, Spain. aurora.saiz@universidadeuropea.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4455-2424
Ana AntoranzFaculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Dentistry-Pregraduate studies, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Plaza Francisco Morano s/n, Madrid, 28005, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1640-9463
Gema CidonchaFaculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Dentistry-Pregraduate studies, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Plaza Francisco Morano s/n, Madrid, 28005, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-2582
Maria Jesús Pardo MonederoFaculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Dentistry-Pregraduate studies, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Plaza Francisco Morano s/n, Madrid, 28005, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6884-2309
Marta Muñoz-CorcueraFaculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Dentistry-Pregraduate studies, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Plaza Francisco Morano s/n, Madrid, 28005, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-4680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a widely used method for assessing clinical competencies in dentistry, it can be a significant source of anxiety for students. Neither the extent to which dental students experience anxiety related to this exam nor the students’ perceptions of the test’s clinical value have been formally measured.

objectiveThis study assessed post-OSCE anxiety in 5th-year dental students, explored gender differences, and evaluated perceptions of realism and educational value compared with prior clinical practice.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 5th -year dental students with a bachelor’s degree in dentistry at the European University of Madrid (2023–2024). After completion of the OSCE, each student anonymously completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), a validated questionnaire designed to measure their state of anxiety, and they reported their perception of the clinical relevance of the OSCE. The overall STAI scores and a comparison of male and female scores were recorded.

resultsA total of 229 dental students completed the OSCE, 200 of whom participated in our study. 82% of the students reported “medium-high” or “very high” anxiety levels. Males presented significantly higher median anxiety scores than females did. No relationship was found between age and anxiety level, regardless of sex. A total of 83.5% of the students felt that the stations were representative of real life and that their previous clinical experience with patients during their two years of clinical internships had prepared them well for the OSCE, enabling them to demonstrate their professional skills. 92% of the students passed the exam.

conclusionsOSCE induces moderate to high levels of anxiety in dental students, particularly among males. Despite this, students generally view the OSCE positively, considering it a useful, realistic, and formative tool.

Indexed as

AnxietyClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEducation, DentalStudents, DentalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAnxietyCompetence assessmentDental educationOSCEPerceptions

Identifiers

PMID41068865
PMCPMC12512387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.