ArticleBMC public health2025
Examining cervical cancer screening adherence: how does healthism influence participation?
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cervical cancer and screening: Knowledge, attitudes, and adherence among university students in Italy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Adherence to Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women in Spain: Evidence from the 2023 Spanish Health Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer is a major public health issue. While HPV screening and vaccination are crucial preventive measures, many countries still struggle to meet the WHO’s participation targets due to a range of systemic, socioeconomic, and psychological barriers. Recent studies suggest that beyond these factors, women’s decisions to attend screening are increasingly shaped by cultural norms that promote health as a personal responsibility, framing participation as both a moral obligation and an expression of a responsible lifestyle.
methodsThis study examines the relationship between a healthy lifestyle and HPV screening participation using data from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS, 2019) for Italy. We use binomial logistic regression as statistical method, with regular screening attendance (versus irregular) as dependent variable.
resultsOur findings indicate that women who adopt healthier lifestyles—particularly in terms of physical activity and dietary habits—are more likely to participate in pap tests. Furthermore, younger women exhibit higher screening participation rates, with early screening initiation (before age 25) associated with greater long-term adherence.
conclusionsThese results suggest that healthism, understood as the pursuit of a healthy lifestyle, plays a significant role in fostering engagement with preventive healthcare measures, although unmeasured confounders may influence both healthy behaviors and screening adherence, thereby limiting the causal interpretation of our findings. Adopting a sociological perspective on surveillance medicine, we argue that healthism is not merely a moral imperative but can serve as a mechanism for empowered agency, encouraging proactive health behaviours. Our findings may inform complementary public health strategies that promote voluntary screening participation by supporting health-oriented behaviours, rather than relying exclusively on top-down interventions. Recognising screening as a social intervention offers a broader analytical framework for addressing cultural and structural barriers to participation, ultimately contributing to more effective and inclusive public health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.