ArticleMalaria journal2025
Indigenous knowledge systems and malaria prevention in Zimbabwe: a market basket analysis.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaria remains a major public health challenge in Zimbabwe, reporting the highest prevalence in Manicaland Province, where indigenous health practices and religious beliefs influence healthcare-seeking behaviours. Understanding the interplay between biomedical and traditional approaches is essential for designing culturally sensitive malaria control strategies. The study explored malaria prevention practices and the role of indigenous knowledge systems, including traditional and spiritual health practices, among adults in Manicaland Province, Zimbabwe.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 480 adults aged 18 years and above, recruited through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires administered in face-to-face interviews. Variables included sociodemographic characteristics, recent malaria experiences, use of indigenous and biomedical malaria prevention methods, and visits to health facilities, traditional healers, or church prophets. Descriptive statistics were computed, and association rule mining (ARM) using the Apriori algorithm in R was employed to identify frequent co-occurring behaviours and health-seeking patterns.
resultsParticipants were predominantly female (69.0%) and within the 25-44 age range (57.5%). A majority reported employment (60.0%) and low household income (47.9%). In the previous three months, 36.7% of respondents and 54.0% of families had experienced malaria. Primary sources of indigenous knowledge included older people (27.7%), informal discussions (7.7%), and observations (5.6%). Association rule mining revealed strong linkages between visits to church prophets and avoidance of traditional healers, as well as notable patterns involving use of cow dung, health facility visits, and indigenous practices. For instance, individuals who visited prophets were highly likely not to have visited traditional healers (support = 0.66, confidence = 0.91, lift = 1.08).
conclusionHealth-seeking behaviour for malaria in Manicaland Province is influenced by complex interactions between spiritual, traditional, and biomedical systems. Indigenous knowledge plays a significant role in malaria prevention and treatment. Public health programmes should integrate culturally informed strategies that respect local belief systems while promoting effective malaria control interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.