ArticleGenome biology2025
A molecular census to elucidate the demixing mechanism of membraneless organelles.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Self-clustering of three CBX2 molecules drives PRC2 to promote facultative heterochromatinization of Polycomb target genes.Molecular cell · 2026Article
- A molecular census to elucidate the demixing mechanism of membraneless organelles.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCells contain membraneless organelles that have been proposed to form via phase separation involving dense networks of multivalent intermolecular interactions. As it is notoriously difficult to experimentally distinguish punctate structures formed by phase separation from those formed by other mechanisms, this issue is controversial. To complement experimental assays, we present a computational by-the-numbers approach to phase separation. We mine publicly available datasets to perform a molecular census of prominent subnuclear organelles in mouse embryonic stem cells: nucleoli, transcriptional condensates, heterochromatin foci, and Polycomb bodies. We estimate copy numbers and intermolecular distances and compare the latter to the Debye length, which is the characteristic distance over which intermolecular interactions typically occur.
resultsWe find that none of the organelles studied here contain any protein species that shows intermolecular distances below the estimated Debye length if molecules in the organelles are randomly distributed, which disfavors the classical one-component phase separation scenario. Considering multiple species based on databases of phase-separating proteins, we find that nucleoli and transcriptional condensates are compatible with multi-component phase separation driven by proteins and RNAs, while heterochromatin foci and Polycomb bodies are better explained by a model in which proteins bind to chromatin without phase-separating via dense multivalent interaction networks. We also provide an interactive tool that allows testing of alternative multi-component scenarios.
conclusionWe introduce a computational by-the-numbers approach to benchmark different demixing models that may explain the assembly of membraneless organelles. Our results suggest that cells use different mechanisms to form subnuclear organelles with different biophysical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.