Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068814›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025

Attitudes and beliefs towards contraception and future intention to use a method among women in refugee settlements in Uganda.

Peter Kisaakye, Francis Obare, George Odwe, Yohannes Dibaba Wado, Gloria Seruwagi, Yadeta Dessie, Bonnie Wandera, Dagim Habteyesus, Abir Nur, Stephen Kizito and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peter KisaakyePopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya. pkisaakye@popcouncil.org.
Francis ObarePopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
George OdwePopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
Yohannes Dibaba WadoAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), APHRC Headquarters, P.O. Box 10787-00100, Kitisuru, Nairobi, Kenya.
Gloria SeruwagiPopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
Yadeta DessieAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), APHRC Headquarters, P.O. Box 10787-00100, Kitisuru, Nairobi, Kenya.
Bonnie WanderaAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), APHRC Headquarters, P.O. Box 10787-00100, Kitisuru, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dagim HabteyesusPopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abir NurPopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
Stephen KizitoPopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
Caroline W KabiruAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), APHRC Headquarters, P.O. Box 10787-00100, Kitisuru, Nairobi, Kenya.
Stella MuthuriPopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
Chi-Chi UndiePopulation Council, Kenya. Avenue 5, 3 Floor, Rose Avenue, P.O Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Government of the United Kingdom PO8612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between attitudes towards contraception and future intention to use a method among women aged 15-45 years in two refugee settlements in Uganda. DATA AND

methodsWe used baseline data from a prospective study conducted among 1794 sexually active women aged 15-45 years, who were not using a contraceptive method at the time of the survey in Kyangwali and Kiryandongo refugee settlements in Uganda. We generated descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to examine the association between intention to use a contraceptive method in future and beliefs and attitudes towards contraception.

resultsAbout a third (30.7%) of non-users intended to use a contraceptive method in future. The proportion of women who intended to use contraception in future was significantly higher among those who, or whose partners, supported its use compared to those who, or whose partners, opposed or were uncertain. Most women who did not intend to use contraception in future believed that their religion did not support married couples using contraception. More women intended to use a method in future if they believed that they could easily access it, the method is effective at preventing a pregnancy, and the method suitable to use or easy to use.

conclusionsIntention to use a method in future was low among women living in refugee settings in Uganda, with side effects being a major reason for non-use among those who intend to use a method in future. Interventions aimed at increasing contraceptive use should focus on counselling strategies that diffuse misinformation related to health concerns.

Indexed as

Attitudes and beliefsContraceptive useIntention to useRefugee settlementsUgandaWomen

Identifiers

PMID41068814
PMCPMC12512545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.