Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068807›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Awareness and attitudes toward digital technologies in orthodontics among dental students in Turkey: a cross-sectional study.

Rumeysa Bilici Geçer, Buse Elburus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rumeysa Bilici GeçerDepartment of Orthodontics, Hamidiye Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Uskudar, 34668, Turkey. rumeysa.bilicigecer@sbu.edu.tr.
Buse ElburusDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital technologies have become increasingly integrated into orthodontic practice for diagnosis, treatment planning, and appliance manufacturing. This study aimed to assess undergraduate dental students' awareness and attitudes toward the use of digital technologies in orthodontics and to explore the potential influence of academic year and intended specialization on these perceptions.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among third-, fourth-, and fifth-year undergraduate students at Istanbul Aydin University, Faculty of Dentistry, during the 2023-2024 academic year. A structured online questionnaire was developed to evaluate students' awareness and attitudes regarding the use of digital technologies in orthodontics. The questionnaire comprised three sections: demographic information, binary (yes/no) questions assessing awareness, and seven attitude statements evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale. Group comparisons were performed using the Pearson Chi-square test or the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test for categorical variables, and the Kruskal-Wallis test for ordinal data. Explanatory factor analysis using principal component analysis with Varimax rotation was applied to assess the construct validity of the attitude scale. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsA total of 278 dental students participated in the study, including 179 females (64.4%) and 99 males (35.6%), with representation from the third (37.4%), fourth (34.9%), and fifth (27.7%) academic years. The most commonly recognized digital orthodontic applications were the fabrication of clear aligners using three-dimensional (3D) printing (91.7%) and the use of intraoral scanners for digital impressions (87.1%). Awareness of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) increased significantly with academic year (third: 36.5%, fifth: 71.4%, p < 0.05), while awareness of digital treatment planning tools declined (third: 43.3%, fifth: 24.7%, p = 0.025). Similarly, knowledge of 3D-printed appliances (third: 43.3%, fourth: 15.5%, p < 0.05) and in-office aligner production (third: 36.5%, fourth: 67%, p < 0.05) varied significantly across years. Attitudinal responses indicated generally positive views toward the integration of digital technologies into orthodontic practice and education. Significant differences were also observed in selected attitude items according to academic year and intended specialization (p < 0.05).

conclusionThis study demonstrated that dental students were more familiar with commonly used technologies such as intraoral scanners and 3D-printed clear aligners, whereas their awareness of other digital applications in orthodontics remained limited. Overall, attitudes toward digital integration were positive across all academic years. Interestingly, despite having more clinical experience, final-year students reported lower awareness in certain areas, underscoring the importance of complementing early theoretical education with consistent and structured clinical exposure in later years. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDigital TechnologyOrthodonticsStudents, DentalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, DentalFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung AdultDental educationDental studentsDigital technologiesOrthodontics

Identifiers

PMID41068807
PMCPMC12512987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.