ArticleBMC health services research2025
Adopting tailored interprofessional protocols in general practice: barriers, strategies, and lessons learned from a CFIR-guided qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation climate and readiness for the THRIVE intervention in school settings: a mixed methods study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the burden of non-communicable diseases continues to rise, general practices in primary care face increasing challenges in delivering high-quality care while managing workload constraints. Interprofessional care models, supported by practice-tailored protocols, offer a promising approach to optimizing task shifting and enhancing care coordination. However, the transition towards protocol-based interprofessional care remains complex and understudied.
objectiveThis study explores the experiences of general practices in developing and implementing practice-tailored protocols to facilitate interprofessional care. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we identify key barriers, facilitators and strategies that support this transition.
methodWe conducted a qualitative study in Flanders, Belgium, using semi-structured interviews with 33 healthcare providers from 18 general practices. Participants represented various disciplines, including general practitioners, nurses, dietitians and reception staff. A hybrid qualitative analysis was applied, beginning with an inductive analysis based on Braun and Clarke's thematic approach, followed by a deductive phase guided by the CFIR-framework.
resultsThe findings highlight several key factors influencing the development and implementation of practice-tailored protocols in general practices. Participants emphasized that clear task allocation and communication structures within protocols improved care coordination. External factors, such as financial constraints and high workloads, posed challenges, whereas collaborations with external healthcare providers facilitated interprofessional teamwork. Internal practice dynamics, including a shared vision, mutual trust, and structured team meetings, were identified as crucial enablers. At the individual level, motivation to adopt protocols varies, with some physicians expressing reluctance due to concerns about shifting patient relationships and increasing complexity in their caseloads. The implementation process benefited from a stepwise approach guided by a team leader, clear goal setting, continuous evaluation and peer learning.
conclusionThe transition towards protocol-based interprofessional care is a complex but mandatory evolution in primary care. While practice-tailored protocols can enhance efficiency and collaboration, their success depends on a structured implementation strategy, effective practice management, and team alignment. Addressing challenges such as gaining trust and provider resistance are critical. Future research should explore scalable support mechanisms and policy adaptations to facilitate widespread adoption of interprofessional care models in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.