ArticlePlant methods2025
OneRosette to predict them all: single plant prompting on a visual foundation model to segment symptomatic Arabidopsis thaliana time series.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From phenoscope to GreenLab model of Arabidopsis to decipher genotype and treatment effects.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- OneRosette to predict them all: single plant prompting on a visual foundation model to segment symptomatic Arabidopsis thaliana time series.Plant methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArabidopsis thaliana is the leading model plant used to study plant-pathogen interactions. High-throughput phenotyping allows for the simultaneous study of many plants with high-frequency image acquisition. Nevertheless, the segmentation of symptomatic plants on natural soil remains challenging, requiring the annotation of hundreds of images and the subsequent training of specialized models for each pathosystem considered. This paper presents a novel approach to segmenting A. thaliana plants' time series using a single annotated image.
resultsImages of A. thaliana plants infected with Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato strain DC3000 were annotated with precise segmentation masks. We compared various mask segmentation methods; our one-shot learning approach obtained a Dice score of 0.977 on our test dataset. Variables extracted from the segmented images allowed statistical discrimination between infected and control plants. We used our one-shot learning approach without further fine-tuning on a new pathosystem; A. thaliana infected with Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum, strain GMI1000. We obtained a Dice score of 0.966 in the second test dataset. We also obtained a Pearson correlation coefficient of - 0.928 between the annotated quantitative disease index and the variable generated with our method.
conclusionsThis work provides a pipeline to segment symptomatic A. thaliana plants by leveraging a visual foundation model. The method has been used successfully on two different pathogens, is fast to train, and does not need a large dedicated graphical processing unit. Our method has characterized plant-pathogen interactions of two pathosystems without fine-tuning for the second pathosystem. Its ease of use and low computing requirements should make adapting our approach to other high-throughput phenotyping platforms easy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.