ArticleHarm reduction journal2025
Community-based participatory research to improve resident wellness in a supportive living facility in the Northwest Territories.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Spruce Bough is the first supportive living facility in Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, and hosts the first long-term residential managed alcohol program (MAP) in northern Canada. The program accepts individuals who have at least two co-morbid mental health, physical health, substance use, and/or mobility concerns. This study sought to hear from residents about their experiences in the program.
methodThis study utilized a community-based participatory approach including the residents of the Spruce Bough in development, design, and data analysis, with the aim of generating results that would improve the lives of residents. Resident co-researchers used inductive coding to draw themes from statements gathered through focus groups and interviews and used these to develop recommendations to improve resident wellness for Spruce Bough leadership.
resultsResidents reported that life was good at Spruce Bough, they had what they needed, and that staff were supportive and helpful. Concerns included unmet needs for special meals for individuals with specific health-related dietary needs; the disruptive behaviour of individuals drinking outside the MAP; and disrespect felt by residents through actions or comments by staff.
conclusionThe Spruce Bough supportive living model is seen as successful by residents; however, they identified potential areas of improvement. Community-based participatory research allowed residents to provide recommendations to be shared with service providers and funders for continued quality improvement. The insights provided and the interest in participation shown by residents indicate that the program would benefit from creating an ongoing mechanism to include resident feedback in decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.