ArticleBMC public health2025
Implementing telemedicine for medical abortion within the public health system: a qualitative study on implementation bottlenecks and solutions in South Africa.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbortion in South Africa is legal, but there are still many barriers to access and high utilisation of the informal sector. Telemedicine for medical abortion is an alternative model that has been found to be a safe, effective, and acceptable option to increase access to abortion services. This study aimed to understand how key informants view telemedicine for medical abortion and how they view potential bottlenecks and solutions concerning implementation in the public sector of South Africa.
methodsWe conducted interviews between February and March 2023 with 19 key informants across telemedicine and medical abortion provision, policy, and research. Through a qualitative design, we analysed the interviews using inductive content analysis. We used Baker et al.'s model of the implementation pathway to conceptualise and discuss the findings.
resultsThe findings showed that respondents perceived telemedicine as a valuable complement to in-clinic care to increase access to safe abortions. Respondents identified clinical concerns and logistical challenges as implementation bottlenecks and believed these could be overcome with innovative thinking and by drawing on existing resources. They suggested that research, leadership, collaboration, and policy alignment would help increase stakeholder willingness and capacity to build health system readiness. Across the implementation process, respondents viewed it necessary to consider users' needs and adapt to contextual differences.
conclusionsThis study identified telemedicine as a valuable model for increasing access to safe abortion services. Respondents outlined considerations and actionable steps to overcome implementation bottlenecks and guide the implementation of telemedicine for medical abortion in the public sector of South Africa and similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.