SynthesisBMC oral health2025
Evolving aspects of oral care in modern nursing: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evolving aspects of oral care in older adults: a systematic review and Meta-synthesis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Thriving at Work and Associated Factors Among Nurses at a Chinese Stomatological Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Nursing Dental Coping Belief Scale among Portuguese healthcare professionals (NDCBS-PT): validation and associated factors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOral care is a critical yet often neglected aspect of nursing, essential for preventing complications like ventilator-associated pneumonia and systemic inflammation. Despite its importance, nurses face challenges due to limited training, time constraints, and inconsistent protocols. The evolving role of nurses in oral care reflects broader healthcare shifts toward interprofessional and patient-centered models. This systematic review examines these dynamics to inform evidence-based improvements.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review synthesized qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies from 2015 to 2025, sourced from PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and grey literature. Search terms targeted nurses' roles, perceptions, barriers, and interventions in oral care. Eligible studies involved registered nurses or students in healthcare settings, with data extracted on study characteristics, outcomes, and interventions. Quality was assessed using JBI and MMAT tools, and a narrative synthesis integrated findings via thematic analysis using NVivo.
resultsFrom 2,347 records, 32 studies across 12 countries were included, covering ICUs (n = 12), general wards (n = 8), and nursing homes (n = 5), with sample sizes ranging from 7 to 1,576 participants. Key themes emerged: inadequate knowledge due to limited education, variable attitudes influenced by setting, inconsistent practices lacking standardized tools, and barriers like workload and resource shortages. Enablers included enhanced training, with over 80% of nurses in multiple studies seeking further education, patient empowerment, interdisciplinary collaboration, and policy support. Training programs, such as virtual reality simulations, improved knowledge and confidence, while resource availability enhanced practice quality.
conclusionNurses' effectiveness in oral care is hindered by educational gaps, systemic barriers, and inconsistent prioritization, but bolstered by targeted training and resources. These findings can guide nursing curricula and hospital policy reforms to prioritize oral care globally. Comprehensive nursing curricula, evidence-based protocols, and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential to elevate oral care as a core responsibility. Future research should focus on scalable interventions in diverse settings to enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.