Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068730›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Postabortion contraception in Brazil: experience in a reference service during the covid-19 pandemic.

Carolina Braga Trabach, Nelio Neves Veiga-Junior, Priscilla Brenda Fonseca Dantas, Aline Aparecida Junqueira, Carina Cordeiro Nunes, Ana Luiza Sturião Vieira Santana, Ana Kaori Fecchio Matsubara, Luiz F Baccaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolina Braga TrabachDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101,- Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Nelio Neves Veiga-JuniorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101,- Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil. neliojunior@hotmail.com.
Priscilla Brenda Fonseca DantasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101,- Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Aline Aparecida JunqueiraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101,- Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Carina Cordeiro NunesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101,- Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Ana Luiza Sturião Vieira SantanaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101,- Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Ana Kaori Fecchio MatsubaraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101,- Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Luiz F BaccaroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Rua Alexander Fleming, 101,- Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the covid-19 pandemic, despite sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services being considered essential, in Brazil, only 55% of abortion services remained in operation. This restriction of access could lead to an increase in unplanned pregnancies, unsafe abortion practices, and, consequently, an increase in the maternal mortality rate. In addition to the difficulty of consolidating information for monitoring and evaluating SRH services. In this scenario, postabortion contraception (PAC) during hospital admission is essential, especially with the postabortion use of long-acting reversible methods (LARC), such as intrauterine devices (IUDs), since they are effective, economical, safe and with immediate contraception.

objectiveTo evaluate postabortion contraceptive methods, mainly LARC, during hospital admission after spontaneous abortion and legal termination of pregnancy and their associated factors through the abortion surveillance network.

methodsa cross-sectional study with women of any age admitted for spontaneous abortions or legal interruption procedures at the Women's Hospital at State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil, between July 2017 and November 2022. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee from UNICAMP. The dependent variable was IUD insertion. The independent variables were clinical, sociodemographic characteristics, vulnerable groups and period of hospitalization (pre-pandemic: until 10/03/2020; pandemic: from 11/03/2020). For statistical analysis, Cochran-Armitage trend tests and an adjusted logistic regression model were used, with the significance of the coefficients evaluated by the p-value, obtained through the Wald statistics associated with each parameter, as well as the confidence interval.

results675 women were hospitalized during the period, 547 for spontaneous abortions and 128 for legal termination. Of these, 499 (79%) had at least one vulnerable factor and 45.2% started PAC during hospital stay, as injectables (48.5%), oral contraceptive pills (34.8% ) and IUDs (13.4%). There was a trend towards increased use of IUDs before hospital discharge (p < 0.01), especially in hospitalizations that occurred during the pandemic period, in the most vulnerable groups (p < 0.01) and women with previous abortions (p < 0.05). The factors independently associated with a higher frequency of IUD insertion were presence of 3 or more vulnerability factors (coefficient 4.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12 to 7.88; p = 0.01); hospitalization during the pandemic period (coefficient 2.56; CI 1.14-3.99; p < 0.01) and the number of abortions (coefficient 0.61; CI 0.09-1.13; p = 0. 02).

conclusionReducing access barriers to highly effective and long-acting contraceptives is an important step towards curbing the rates of unplanned pregnancies. Increasing rates of postabortion IUD use in vulnerable populations and in the context of the pandemic reinforce the importance of the epidemiological surveillance strategy in reducing exposure to preventable risks such as unsafe abortion and managing SRH policy strategies to reduce the maternal mortality rate.

Indexed as

AftercareContraceptionCOVID-19Abortion, InducedAdolescentAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2Young AdultAbortionContraceptionCOVID-19Perinatal information systemPopulation surveillance

Identifiers

PMID41068730
PMCPMC12512372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.