Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068712›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Implementation of the Noncommunicable Disease Capacity Assessment and Planning Process in Iraq, Jordan, and Pakistan.

Randa K Saad, Meredith H Kruse, Patricia Richter, Lara Kufoof, Zakir Hussein, Yousef Khader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Randa K SaadResearch and Policy, Center of Excellence for Applied Epidemiology, Global Health Development| Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Amman, Jordan. randaksaad@gmail.com.
Meredith H KruseGlobal Public Health Systems Branch, Division of Global Health Protection, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Patricia RichterGlobal Public Health Systems Branch, Division of Global Health Protection, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Lara KufoofProject Management Office, Global Health Development| Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Amman, Jordan.
Zakir HusseinGlobal Health Development| Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Yousef KhaderDepartment of Community Medicine, Public Health, and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

CDC HHS NU2HGH000039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) necessitates coordinated, country-tailored responses. The NCD Capacity Assessment and Planning (N-CAP) Process is a tool that strengthens public health functions and promotes multisectoral collaboration to achieve more sustainable and impactful progress. This case study describes the piloting and implementation of the N-CAP Process in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

methodsThe N-CAP Process includes three sequential, facilitator-led activities: stakeholder mapping, a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Workshop (SWOT), and an N-CAP Workshop. Jordan, Iraq, and Pakistan were identified as countries with ministries of health with sufficient resources to implement the N-CAP Process and its recommendations. The N-CAP Process was piloted in Jordan (2021), revised for Iraq (2022), and implemented in its final version in Pakistan (2023). Qualified local facilitators and recorders were trained in each country prior to use. Stakeholder mapping was conducted in coordination with the ministries of health to identify multisectoral, technical, and policy stakeholders to participate in the activities. The SWOT Workshops convened stakeholders to assess the current landscape and identify critical NCD public health functions. The N-CAP Workshops used discussion guides to facilitate assessment and planning exercises that helped participants determine how to strengthen capacity within the critical NCD area.

resultsThe N-CAP Process led stakeholders to assess their country's efforts across six public health domains (strategic direction, systems, resources, quality, engagement, and impact) and create prioritized recommendations or a plan to reach a higher level of functioning to better address NCDs. Participants in Jordan, Iraq, and Pakistan used the N-CAP Process to focus on data-to-action, coalition strengthening, and surveillance, respectively. While each country's outcomes were unique and context-specific, common themes emerged, including health workforce, health information, health financing, and leadership and governance, all of which contribute to health system strengthening in different ways.

conclusionsThe N-CAP Process effectively creates structured, multisectoral recommendations and actionable plans to increase national capacity to address public health threats, such as NCDs. By facilitating comprehensive assessments and fostering governmental and multisectoral engagement, the N-CAP Process serves as an adaptable resource for countries and other regions grappling with similar public health challenges.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingHealth PlanningNoncommunicable DiseasesHumansIraqJordanPakistanPilot ProjectsAssessment and planningIraqJordanMultisectoralN-CAP processNoncommunicable diseasesPakistanPublic health

Identifiers

PMID41068712
PMCPMC12512677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.