Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068710›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Understanding posterior drooling in children and young people with neurodevelopmental disabilities: a parental perspective.

Lynn B Orriëns, Jan J W van der Burg, Petra Maille-Wisse, Angret de Boer, Frank J A van den Hoogen, Michèl A A P Willemsen, Karen van Hulst, Corrie E Erasmus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lynn B OrriënsDivision of Paediatric Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Lynn.Orriens@radboudumc.nl.
Jan J W van der BurgSchool of Pedagogical and Educational Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Petra Maille-WisseDivision of Paediatric Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Angret de BoerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Frank J A van den HoogenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Michèl A A P WillemsenDivision of Paediatric Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Karen van HulstDepartment of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Corrie E ErasmusDivision of Paediatric Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaliva control problems in children and young people with neurodevelopmental disabilities are classified as anterior drooling (i.e. loss of saliva from the mouth) and posterior drooling (i.e. saliva spillage into the oropharynx). Posterior drooling poses serious health risks, but is often missed or misinterpreted. This study explored how parents perceive its symptoms and impact on daily life.

methodsSemi-structured focus group discussions were conducted with parents of children with posterior drooling, directed toward observable signs and impact on children as well as family. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.

resultsThree focus group sessions were conducted (total n = 12). Posterior drooling generally manifested across four domains: (1) head and throat, (2) airways, (3) stomach, and (4) whole body. The impact of posterior drooling encompassed effects on children's well-being, social participation, independence, and interference with other conditions. For parents, posterior drooling posed practical, emotional, and social challenges and burdens - such as constant vigilance due to fear of choking, frustration about lack of effective treatment, and limited ability to participate in family or social activities - placing a considerable burden on daily life and caregiving.

conclusionsThis qualitative study offers valuable initial insights into how parents characterise posterior drooling, shedding light on crucial information to enhance recognition and diagnosis. The findings underscore the need for earlier detection and identification of posterior drooling symptoms, supported by improved communication between healthcare professionals and families through a shared language that bridges clinical and everyday observations. The extensive impact on children and families also highlights the urgency of providing clearer guidance to parents on managing fluctuating or worsening symptoms, and of developing more comprehensive, tailored care strategies.

Indexed as

Neurodevelopmental DisordersParentsSialorrheaAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeChildrenParentsPosterior droolingQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41068710
PMCPMC12512428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.