Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068667›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

General knowledge and attitude of healthcare professionals and infrastructural readiness prior to implementation of malaria vaccine in selected hospitals in Tororo district, Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

Lillian Asio, Innocent Besigye, Steven Sean Puleh, Norah Nazziwa, Moses Ocan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lillian AsioDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala , Uganda. liliandoren22@gmail.com.
Innocent BesigyeDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Steven Sean PulehDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Lira University, Lira, Uganda.
Norah NazziwaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public health, Makerere University, Kampala , Uganda.
Moses OcanDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala , Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of malaria vaccines (RTS, S/SA01 and R21/Matrix-M) in malaria control brings hope for malaria burden reduction globally. Uganda is one of the countries that applied for support to introduce R21 malaria vaccine and expects to commence with its implementation in April/May 2025. However, as the country prepares for R21 malaria vaccine rollout, the extent to which hospitals are ready for its implementation remains unclear. This study therefore assessed the general knowledge, attitudes of all healthcare professionals regardless of their role in providing immunization services and infrastructural readiness prior to rolling out of R21 malaria vaccine in an endemic setting, Tororo district.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at Tororo General hospital and St. Anthony Hospital in Tororo district. Data was collected before the vaccine was rolled out through interviews with purposively selected healthcare professionals irrespective of their role in vaccination programs. Additional data was collected through inspection of the hospital infrastructure for malaria vaccine implementation. Data on healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes was collected using self-administered questionnaires, while a checklist was used to capture data on the availability and functional state of the infrastructure in hospitals for vaccine roll-out. Fully completed questionnaires were entered into Epi-data version 4.7 for coding and cleaning, thereafter exported to STATA version 16 for analysis.

resultsA total of 211 healthcare professionals were included into the study. The study participants had predominantly negative attitudes towards the malaria vaccine, with 70% (147/211, 95% CI: 63-76) displaying unfavorable attitudes compared to 30% (64/211, 95% CI: 25-37) with positive attitudes, and the overall mean score (SD) of 3.30 (0.489)., many of whom expressed concerns about its affordability, accessibility and effectiveness. Knowledge on the malaria vaccine was notably low, with 99% (208/211, 95% CI: 96-100) of respondents demonstrating poor knowledge, while only 1% (3/211, 95% CI: 0.5-4.4) had good knowledge.

conclusionThe knowledge gap coupled with negative attitudes on malaria vaccine were prevalent among all healthcare professionals prior to the roll-out of R21 vaccine in Tororo district. There was limited preparedness as regards the infrastructure required for the malaria vaccine implementation. The Ministry of Health should consider conducting targeted training programs for all healthcare professionals and provision of additional essential infrastructure to accommodate the inclusion of the malaria vaccine roll-out with other routine vaccines.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelImmunization ProgramsMalariaMalaria VaccinesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaMalaria VaccinesAttitudeInfrastructureKnowledgeMalaria vaccine implementation

Identifiers

PMID41068667
PMCPMC12512432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.