ArticleBMC surgery2025
Comparative efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus surgeon-performed intraoperative intercostal nerve block in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) offers reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery, yet optimal analgesia remains essential. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane (ESP) block and intercostal nerve block (ICNB), are commonly employed. This study compares preoperative ESP block with surgeon-performed intraoperative ICNB in VATS patients.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 82 patients (≥ 18 years; ASA I-III) underwent elective VATS between January 2020 and December 2022 were analyzed. Forty patients received a postoperative ESP block and 42 an intraoperative ICNB. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale, postoperative peak expiratory flow (PEF), postoperative IV opioid analgesic use, drainage time, and hospital length of stay.
resultsBaseline demographics were similar. VAS scores were comparable at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h. At postoperative 48 h, the ICNB group had significantly lower VAS scores (4.17 ± 1.03 vs. 4.78 ± 1.03; p = 0.00987). No significant differences were observed in postoperative iv opioid analgesic use, drainage time or hospital stay.
conclusionsBoth techniques provide effective early analgesia in VATS, with ICNB showing prolonged pain relief. Further prospective studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.