ArticleBMC public health2025
Public attitudes towards obesity policies on the island of Ireland; exploring the relationship with biopsychosocial characteristics.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublic attitudes towards policies targeting obesity can influence their implementation. Gaining a better understanding of the levels of public agreement with different policies and their determinants can contribute to the development of effective approaches that can halt the rise of obesity. This study aimed to: (1) group a number of different regulatory approaches to preventing obesity into coherent categories; and (2) explore how anthropometrics (bio), health behaviours and obesity-related beliefs and experiences (psycho) and social determinants (social) may influence agreement with different obesity-related policies on the island of Ireland.
methodsA cross-sectional telephone survey collected data from a randomly selected quota sample of 1000 adults who live in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Participants reported their level of agreement with 39 policies considered to impact upon obesity risk. They also provided information on biopsychosocial factors including demographics, anthropometrics, diet and physical activity behaviours, obesity-related beliefs and experiences of weight discrimination. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed to organise the policies into coherent groups. Multiple linear regression examined the presence of a relationship between attitudes towards a class of policies and other collected variables.
resultsFive policy scales including thirty-three policies were obtained: (1) Enabling healthier environments and communities, (2) 'Hard' polices, (3) Resources, (4) Promotion and information on health and food and (5) Advertising restrictions on unhealthy food. Higher levels of agreement with all policy categories was associated with: older age; living comfortably on current income; being physically active; and endorsing health risks of obesity. Women reported greater agreement with Enabling healthier environments, 'Hard' polices and more Resources, compared with men. Respondents who viewed maintaining a healthy weight as costly were less likely to agree with Resources, Promotion and information, and Advertising restrictions. Participants with personal experience of weight discrimination were less likely to agree with 'Hard' policies.
conclusionThis study reveals a considerable variation in public attitudes towards obesity policies which varied by individual biopsychosocial characteristics. Present findings have important implications for policy makers tasked with designing and implementing acceptable approaches to prevent obesity at a population level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.