ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Assessment of emotional status and risk factors in early pregnancy using multidimensional data: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPregnancy-related emotional disorders are prevalent and significantly impact maternal and child health. Addressing these disorders and implementing effective interventions are essential for improving health outcomes. This study utilizes multidimensional data to assess the emotional state and risk factors during early pregnancy, providing evidence-based support for optimizing mental health management strategies and clinical decision-making for pregnant women.
methodsUsing a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 1,395 pregnant women via stratified sampling between April and September 2021. A structured questionnaire was administered to gather information on demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, sleep quality, medication use, and psychological health indicators. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression models were utilized to identify independent factors influencing emotional anxiety and to construct a risk prediction model.
results(1) Emotional Status: The prevalence of anxiety was 22.15%, with 75.13% of pregnant women expressing concerns about fetal health and 65.23% reporting significant psychological burden related to childbirth pain. (2) Univariate Analysis: Age stratification (F = 5.197, p = 0.006) and primiparity (t = - 2.219, p = 0.027) were significantly associated with emotional anxiety. Participants with sleep disorders (13.69%) had significantly higher anxiety scores (t = - 9.629, p < 0.001). Progesterone medications (t = 2.456, p = 0.014) and levothyroxine (t = 7.317, p < 0.001) were significantly negatively correlated with anxiety. In contrast, a history of smoking (F = 7.116, p = 0.001), alcohol consumption (F = 18.787, p < 0.001), and secondhand smoke exposure (t= -7.442, p < 0.001) were significantly positively correlated with anxiety. (3) Multivariate Model: Primiparity, sleep disorders, alcohol consumption, and secondhand smoke exposure were identified as independent risk factors for emotional anxiety (β > 0, p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: The sample was limited to a specific region and time frame, which may have affected the generalizability of the findings.
conclusionUtilizing multidimensional data to assess the emotional state and risk factors of pregnant women, and conducting intelligent analysis can accurately identify emotional risks during pregnancy. In the future, integrating sleep interventions, lifestyle optimization, and social support networks could lead to the development of digital health tools for dynamic early warning. It is recommended to embed these tools into routine prenatal management processes to advance the precision and personalization of mental health services during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.