ArticleBMC public health2025
The psychological impact of asbestos exposure: risk perception and emotional distress among former workers in Tuscany.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExposure to asbestos continues to be a global health hazard, with significant mortality linked to asbestos-related diseases. Despite asbestos bans in many countries, including Italy (1992), former asbestos workers continue to experience health risks and psychological distress. This study examines the psychological impact of asbestos exposure among former workers enrolled in the Tuscany Region’s health surveillance program, focusing on risk perception, emotional distress, and service evaluation.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022, involving 362 former asbestos-exposed workers participating in the Tuscany Region’s health surveillance program. Participants were interviewed via structured telephone surveys administered by trained psychologists. The questionnaire assessed asbestos-risk perception, self-perceived asbestos exposure, psychological distress (sadness, anxiety, anger, fear), and satisfaction with health services. Statistical analyses, including generalized logistic regression models, were performed to evaluate associations between risk perception and psychological symptoms.
resultsAmong participants, 77.9% believed they were at risk of developing an asbestos-related disease in the future, and 61.1% reported significant past exposure. Emotional distress was prevalent, with high self-perceived levels of sadness (mean: 5.1), anger (5.3), fear (4.9), and anxiety (4.0). Risk perception strongly correlated with psychological distress: those who believed they were at future risk exhibited higher levels of fear (OR: 2.86) and anger (OR: 2.56), while those who were uncertain about their past exposure showed increased anxiety (OR: 13.0) and anger (OR: 3.60). Additionally, knowing someone affected by an asbestos-related disease was associated with greater sadness (OR: 3.92) and fear (OR: 3.94). Despite psychological distress, health surveillance services were well-rated, particularly in staff availability (56.6%) and assistance quality (55.2%).
conclusionsThis study emphasizes the psychological effects of asbestos exposure over the long term, underlining the need for integrated mental health support within health surveillance programs. The strong link between risk perception and emotional distress suggests that psychological interventions, like counselling and education ought to be used in conjunction with medical monitoring. Addressing these needs can enhance the well-being of former asbestos-exposed workers, mitigating the lasting effects of exposure-related uncertainty and fear. Future research should focus on developing targeted interventions to support this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.