ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
The relationship between components of the biosafety incident response competence for clinical nursing staff: a network analysis.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The internal structure of transformational leadership as perceived by clinical nurses: a network analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiosafety, which pertains to the prevention of exposure to biological hazards that could pose risks to human health, ecosystems, and the environment, has become a global concern. Nowadays, biosafety threats are widespread and long-standing, posing a severe risk to all human lives. A key measure in tackling biosafety issues is to clarify the competence of clinical nursing staff in responding to biosafety incidents. Nevertheless, little network analysis research has been done on the relationships between the components of clinical nurses’ biosafety incident response competence. PURPOSE: To better and more accurately help clinical nurses enhance their ability to respond to biosafety incidents, this study examined the network structure of the components that make up biosafety incident response competence.
designA network analysis.
methodsFrom September to November 2023, we invited 4600 clinical nurses to participate in our study. Eventually, 4338 nurses provided valid responses, with an effective response rate reaching 94.30% (4338/4600). The biosafety incident response competence of nursing staff was assessed using a scale developed by the research team. Network analysis was adopted for statistical analysis.
resultsIn the current network, “Master the correct collection methods of blood culture samples and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with biological infection; P5: Understand the vaccination of biosafety protective vaccines”, “Possess the ability to assess the harm of pathogenic microorganisms”, “Master the key points of medical record management and record of patients with biological infection” and “Be familiar with the concept of antimicrobial resistance and the use of antimicrobials” have the highest expected influences. In the community of biosafety infection protection abilities, “Master the correct collection methods of blood culture samples and nasopharyngeal swabs from patients with biological infection” has the highest bridge expected influence. In the community of biosafety event monitoring and warning abilities, “Understand the main points and requirements of detection and screening of pathogenic microorganisms and drug-resistant bacteria” has the highest bridge expected influence. And in the community of biosafety knowledge preparedness, “Possess the ability to properly transport and evacuate bio-infected patients”, and “Be familiar with biosafety incidents involving paramedics that require paramedic involvement” have the highest bridge expected influence.
conclusionThe components of clinical nursing staff’s biosafety incident response competence are interconnected through complex association patterns. From a network analysis perspective, four items exhibit the highest expected influence, signifying their paramount importance within the network. Additionally, another four items possess the highest bridge expected influence, indicating their strongest connections with the other three communities. These findings provide significant implications for clinical practice, as they offer potential targets for interventions aimed at enhancing nursing staff’s ability to handle biosafety events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.