ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Failed induction of labor and associated factors among women receiving induction at public hospitals of Kembata zone in central Ethiopia.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFailed induction of labour contributes to high caesarean section rates, posing risks to both maternal and neonatal health. Despite its clinical importance, limited data exists on the prevalence and determinants of failed induction of labour in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and determinants of failed induction of labour among women in public hospitals of central Ethiopia.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted across multiple health facilities. Data were extracted from the 386 randomly selected medical charts using a pre-tested checklist, then entered into Epi data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Multivariable Logistic regression analysis was performed and statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05.
resultsThe prevalence of failed labor induction was 21.2%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 17-25%. Factors significantly associated with failed induction included age over 30 years [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 6.78, 95% CI: 3.13-14.70], being a primigravida [AOR = 6.68, 95% CI: 3.10-14.40], a low Bishop score [AOR = 3.90, 95% CI: 1.62-9.39], and premature rupture of membranes [AOR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.42-7.54].
conclusionThe study identified a high rate of failed labour induction. Key factors contributing to failed labour induction included maternal age over 30 years, primigravida status, a low Bishop score, and premature rupture of membranes. Enhanced monitoring and follow-up are necessary to mitigate potential adverse effects on both maternal and fetal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.