ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
Mechanical Stimulation in the Residual Femur During Gait in Transfemoral Prosthesis Users Provides a Potential Reason for Bone Mineral Density Loss.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mechanical Stimulation in the Residual Femur During Gait in Transfemoral Prosthesis Users Provides a Potential Reason for Bone Mineral Density Loss.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with transfemoral amputation (TFA) experience bone loss in their residual femur at levels seen in bedridden and post-menopausal individuals. It has been suggested that the time until first prosthesis fitting, gait deviations, and muscle atrophy may be contributing factors, but evidence is inconsistent. Prosthetic sockets are typically designed to off-load the distal end of the residual limb, yet the effect of the load transmission pathways of the prosthetic socket on a residual femur has not been examined. Using existing datasets, we recreated the prosthetic socket environment within finite element (FE) models by extracting the skeletal geometries of 10 able-bodied individuals from computer tomography scans, and anthropometrically pairing them with gait data acquired from individuals with unilateral TFA. Normal skeletal geometries were modified to resemble a TFA and fit with an ischial containment socket (ICS). The modified skeleton was positioned with respect to the socket using motion analysis marker locations and tested using the ground reaction forces corresponding to three gait instances from at least four steps. Additional mirror models without the ICS were created for comparison. We validated our study by comparing hip forces from the original gait data to acetabular contact forces estimated using the FE models. We found that the residual femur wearing an ICS experienced mean compressive strain of -105 ± 42 μE and -722 ± 155 μE without the ICS. Simulations show that this is because the ICS redirects load through the pelvis, diminishing force transmission from the femoral head to the acetabulum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.