Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068549›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025

Mechanical Stimulation in the Residual Femur During Gait in Transfemoral Prosthesis Users Provides a Potential Reason for Bone Mineral Density Loss.

Jose L Zavaleta-Ruiz, Stefania Fatone, Matthew J Major, Pankaj Pankaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jose L Zavaleta-RuizInstitute for Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5451-7264
Stefania FatoneDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Prosthetics & Orthotics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Matthew J MajorDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Pankaj PankajInstitute for Bioengineering, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9317-3909

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with transfemoral amputation (TFA) experience bone loss in their residual femur at levels seen in bedridden and post-menopausal individuals. It has been suggested that the time until first prosthesis fitting, gait deviations, and muscle atrophy may be contributing factors, but evidence is inconsistent. Prosthetic sockets are typically designed to off-load the distal end of the residual limb, yet the effect of the load transmission pathways of the prosthetic socket on a residual femur has not been examined. Using existing datasets, we recreated the prosthetic socket environment within finite element (FE) models by extracting the skeletal geometries of 10 able-bodied individuals from computer tomography scans, and anthropometrically pairing them with gait data acquired from individuals with unilateral TFA. Normal skeletal geometries were modified to resemble a TFA and fit with an ischial containment socket (ICS). The modified skeleton was positioned with respect to the socket using motion analysis marker locations and tested using the ground reaction forces corresponding to three gait instances from at least four steps. Additional mirror models without the ICS were created for comparison. We validated our study by comparing hip forces from the original gait data to acetabular contact forces estimated using the FE models. We found that the residual femur wearing an ICS experienced mean compressive strain of -105 ± 42 μE and -722 ± 155 μE without the ICS. Simulations show that this is because the ICS redirects load through the pelvis, diminishing force transmission from the femoral head to the acetabulum.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsBone DensityFemurGaitAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle Agedfinite element analysisosteopeniaprosthetic sockettransfemoral amputation

Identifiers

PMID41068549
PMCPMC12510909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.