ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Urological benchtop and in silico models validated by human penile tissue inflation tests.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeInflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is a well-established treatment for erectile dysfunction. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanical interactions between the IPP and penile tissues is crucial for improving surgical outcomes and device performance. This study aims to develop and validate preclinical testbeds, including a polymer-based benchtop model and a finite element (FE) model, to replicate the biomechanical behaviour of penile tissues during IPP inflation.
methodsA polymer-based benchtop model was developed using porous and non-porous polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogels, with the porous PVA mimicking the spongy corpus cavernosum (CC) and the non-porous PVA representing the tunica albuginea and fascial layers. IPP inflation tests were conducted on three benchtop models and three human penile tissue segments. Additionally, 3D FE simulations of IPP inflation were performed on both the benchtop and human tissue models for comparative analysis.
resultsThe experimental results demonstrated strong agreement between the human penile tissues, the benchtop model, and the FE simulations, validating the preclinical testbeds. Parametric studies using the FE model revealed that CC layer size and stiffness significantly influence IPP inflation mechanics, highlighting the importance of these factors in device performance. These validated preclinical testbeds provide a robust platform for optimising IPP design, guiding surgical procedures, and mitigating associated post-implantation complications.
conclusionThe developed benchtop and FE models effectively replicate human penile tissue responses to IPP inflation and can serve as valuable preclinical tools for device manufacturers and clinicians. Their use may enhance surgical decision-making and improve long-term IPP outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41068537What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.