ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Salivary gland tissue chip screening identifies candidate radioprotective drugs.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organ-on-chip (OoC) and nano-biomaterials: next generation of precision oral and dental healthcare research.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Engineering models of head and neck and oral cancers on-a-chip.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost head and neck cancer patients treated with ionizing radiation loose salivary gland function. Patients with decreased saliva have trouble eating, speaking and are predisposed to oral infections and tooth decay. Amifostine is the only FDA approved drug to prevent radiation-induced hyposalivation. However, it has intolerable side-effects that limit its use, motivating the discovery of alternative therapeutics.
methodsWe leveraged our salivary gland tissue chip platform for high-content drug discovery that we developed using submandibular gland tissue from female SKH1 hairless mice, backcrossed 6 generations with C57BL/6 J mice. We developed in-chip assays to quantify reduced glutathione and cellular senescence, which are accepted biomarkers of radiation damage. We validated radioprotection using WR-1065, the active form of Amifostine and tested other reported radioprotective drugs including Edaravone, Tempol, N-acetylcysteine, Rapamycin, Ex-Rad, and Palifermin. Next, a Selleck Chemicals library of FDA-approved drugs was screened for radioprotection. Lead hits were tested in mouse models.
resultsWe identify 25 candidate compounds and down-select them using EC50 values and published pharmacologic data. This lead us to test Phenylbutazone (an anti-inflammatory), Enoxacin (a fluoroquinolone antibiotic), and Doripenem (a carbapenem antibiotic) for in vivo radioprotection in mice. Results confirm that these three drugs exhibit radioprotection equivalent to Amifostine but with superior EC50 values, ranging from 140 to 6900-fold lower values.
conclusionsThis body of work demonstrates the development and validation of assays using a tissue chip platform for high-content drug screening and the successful discovery and in vivo validation of candidate radioprotective drugs with non-antioxidant primary modes of action. These results point to possible unknown mechanisms of radioprotection. These drugs can be developed to improve radioprotection efficacy and clinical administration without adverse side-effects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.