ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2025
Investigations on the Spatial Dust Distribution for Emission Site Localization in Containment.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dustiness and the spatial distribution of dust are major problems when working with highly active pharmaceutical ingredients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a chamber setup that allows a reproducible atomization of small powder quantities and the detection of not only dustiness but also the spatial distribution of airborne dust at extremely low concentrations, to prove that an emission site may be localized with stationary sampling even in a confined space. For this purpose, the time required for evacuation of the chamber setup was determined with fuming sulfuric acid. In subsequent atomization experiments, the safe surrogate acetaminophen was used. The spatial distribution of the surrogate was detected with nine IOM samplers (Institute of Occupational Medicine) and its quantification was carried out via HPLC. A linear tendency of the quantity of aerosol formed in dependence of the sample mass was demonstrated. In addition, significant differences between individual spots of detection and thus a spatial distribution in the detection chamber was observed. These results indicated a strong convective mass transport within the chamber setup. To verify these results, the airflow used for atomization was simulated using Computational Fluid Dynamics, confirming the convective mass transport and the spatial distribution of the airborne acetaminophen dust. In summary, it was shown that an emission site may be localized based on stationary exposure data even at concentrations as low as those mandatory in the contained manufacture of HPAPI-containing pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41068534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.