Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068512›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2025

Emerging trends in 2D nanostructured electrode materials as enzyme-mimicking glucose sensors for biomedical diagnostics: a comprehensive review.

Mani Arivazhagan, Paramasivam Shanmugam, Samikannu Prabu, Nagaraj Murugan, Yoong Ahm Kim, Rajaji Pavadai, Krishnamoorthy Shanmugaraj, Jaroon Jakmunee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mani ArivazhaganResearch Laboratory for Analytical Instrument and Electrochemistry Innovation, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Paramasivam ShanmugamDepartment of Biomaterials, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, SIMATS, Saveetha University, 600 077, Chennai, India.
Samikannu PrabuGraduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, Taiwan, Chung-Da Road, Chung-Li District, No.300, Tao-Yuan City, 32001, Taiwan.
Nagaraj MuruganDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Graduate School, School of Polymer Science and Engineering, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-Ro, Buk-Gu, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea.
Yoong Ahm KimDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Graduate School, School of Polymer Science and Engineering, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-Ro, Buk-Gu, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea.
Rajaji PavadaiDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.
Krishnamoorthy ShanmugarajDepartamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Tarapacá, Avda. General Velásquez 1775, Arica, Chile.
Jaroon JakmuneeResearch Laboratory for Analytical Instrument and Electrochemistry Innovation, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand. jaroon.jakmunee@cmu.ac.th.

Funding

the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources and Institutional Development, Research, and Innovation B13F680076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of nonenzymatic glucose sensors for biomedical diagnostics has gained new momentum due to recent developments in two-dimensional (2D) nanostructured materials. Two dimensional (2D) materials, these include transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), MXenes, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and graphene-based composites, are perfect candidates for enzyme-mimicking glucose detection because of their distinctive physicochemical characteristics, which include high surface area, a large signal to noise ratio (S/N), excellent electrical conductivity, higher thermal stability, and an abundance of active sites. This review emphasizes the new approaches to creating 2D nanostructured electrodes that mimic the catalytic activity of natural enzymes, with an emphasis on structural alterations, synthesis techniques, and electrochemical platform integration. Critical evaluation is done on the performance metrics, which include linear response ranges, sensitivity, detection limits, and selectivity in complex biological matrices of blood serum and urine samples. Additionally, the difficulties and potential for clinical translation of these biosensing platforms are also examined in detail. The revolutionary potential of 2D nanomaterials in developing next-generation, dependable, and reasonably priced glucose sensors for real-time biomedical diagnostics is highlighted by this comprehensive review.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsBiosensing TechniquesBlood GlucoseElectrochemical TechniquesGlucoseNanostructuresElectrodesGraphiteHumansMetal-Organic FrameworksBlood GlucoseGlucoseGraphiteMetal-Organic FrameworksBiomedical diagnosticsEnzyme-mimicsGlucose sensorsMXenesNanostructures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.