SynthesisUpdates in surgery2026
Three-dimensional image guidance for diagnosis and treatment of adrenal disease: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adrenal abnormalities are common imaging findings requiring comprehensive workup. Invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, including adrenal surgery, demand expertise to mitigate risks of severe complications. Recent applications of 3D image analyses range from enhanced diagnosis to therapeutic guidance with anatomical visualisation. This study assesses the efficacy and clinical utility of 3D image analyses in managing adrenal disease. This systematic review, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024500783), adheres to PRISMA guidelines. Searches of PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov up to August 2024 identified eligible studies. Extracted data included imaging modalities, 3D applications for diagnosis or treatment, volumetric segmentation techniques, and differentiation between pathologic and normal adrenal glands. Technological maturity was assessed with the IDEAL framework. Of 1813 studies screened, 30 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 5304 imaging exams (2060F/2106M, and 10 studies with 1115 cases), predominantly CT (27 CT, 90%; 2 MRI, 6.7%; 1 CT/MRI 3.3%). Volumetric reconstructions employed manual, semiautomatic and automatic methods for digital visualisation, and subsequent 3D printing. 3D analyses of normal vs. neoplastic adrenal tissue supported diagnosis in 18 studies (60%), and treatment in 12 (40%), improving understanding of respective anatomical features and planning for operative and interventional procedures. These applications represented early IDEAL stages of surgical innovation (0-preclinical, 1-idea and 2-development/exploration). 3D image analyses show promise in optimising adrenal disease management by aiding adrenal lesion characterisation and treatment optimisation through pre- and intraprocedural guidance. Further clinical assessment and long-term studies are warranted to establish the broader clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.