ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on parallel computing of the olfactory neural network based on multithreading.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To improve the computational efficiency of olfactory neural network, this paper proposes a multithreading-based parallel computing method. Firstly, focusing on the olfactory neural network and its neuronal equations, this paper analyzes and compares the computational efficiency and recognition performance of the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method (RK4) and other ODE solvers in the olfactory neural network. This establishes the foundation for subsequent ODE solver selection. Then, while maintaining recognition accuracy, this paper implements parallel computing in olfactory neural networks through data parallelism based on multithreading, aiming to improve their computational efficiency. Experimental results indicate that when balancing computational speed and recognition accuracy, the forward Euler method emerges as the most suitable ODE solver for the neuronal equations of the olfactory neural network. Its average computation time is 7205 s, and the average recognition accuracy is 98.19%. The multithreading-based data parallel computing method proposed in this paper can effectively improve the computational efficiency of the olfactory neural network. When the number of threads is 12, the olfactory neural network achieves relatively the best experimental results: the average speedup ratio S is 7.9082, the parallel efficiency E is 0.6590, the average recognition accuracy is 98.30%, and the computation time is 1,359 s. Notably, when the number of threads is 5, the olfactory neural network reaches the highest average recognition accuracy of 98.77% on the epileptic EEG dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.