ArticleScientific reports2025
Hemodynamics in femoro-femoral venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using large eddy simulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital performance testing reveals how redesigned return cannulas can enhance VV-ECMO performance.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Simple and reliable method for predicting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation flow rates and circuit pressures.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Multimodal characterization of flow-induced thrombus initiation and growth in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficiency and hemodynamics of dual drainage venovenous ECMO: A computational parametric study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used for support in refractory severe respiratory failure. Venous drainage and return are accomplished through cannulation of patient's major veins, typically on the neck and/or the groins. Cannulation configuration may affect treatment efficiency, but it remains unclear if any strategy is superior. Computational fluid dynamics was used to evaluate and compare the femoro-femoral (FF), jugulo-femoral (JF), and femoro-jugular (FJ) cannulation configurations. Cannulae were modelled in an adult patient-averaged geometry of the right atrium and venae cavae. Large eddy simulations were performed at ECMO flow rates of 2-6 L/min. Time-averaged flow data was collected for assessment of flow parameters associated with clinical efficiency. FF cannulation showed lower recirculation than FJ and JF. Negative pressures in the inferior vena cava, associated with an increased risk of vascular collapse, were more pronounced in the FF configuration. Additionally, wall shear stresses exceeded physiological levels even at low flow rates and increased with higher flow, increasing the risk of blood trauma. Shear stress varied significantly inside the drainage cannula, highlighting sensitivity to local flow dynamics. This study advances our understanding of three common VV ECMO configurations, giving insights to improve efficiency and address clinical challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.