Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068354›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Serum KL-6 as a biomarker to predict progression at one year in interstitial lung disease.

Francesco Bonella, M C Vegas Sanchez, M d'Alessandro, P Millan-Billi, R F Santos, N Schröder, H N Bastos, M Molina-Molina, O Sánchez Pernaute, D Castillo Villegas and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesco BonellaCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Disease, Pneumology Department, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. Francesco.bonella@rlk.uk-essen.de.
M C Vegas SanchezImmunology Department, Jiménez Díaz Foundation University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
M d'AlessandroRespiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
P Millan-BilliDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
R F Santosi3S -Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
N SchröderCenter for Interstitial and Rare Lung Disease, Pneumology Department, Ruhrlandklinik University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
H N Bastosi3S -Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
M Molina-MolinaILD Unit, Pulmonology Service, Bellvitge University Hospital - IDIBELL-Barcelona, CIBERES Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
O Sánchez PernauteRheumatology Department, Jiménez Díaz Foundation University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
D Castillo VillegasDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
E BargagliRespiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About one third of non-IPF ILD patients progresses over time. Serum KL-6, a lung epithelial mucin type 1, is an established marker to assess disease severity in ILD but its ability to predict progression needs to be further explored. To investigate whether serum KL-6 is of additional value to stratify the patients for the risk of developing clinical or functional progression at one year. ILD patients from 6 European centers were retrospectively enrolled. Disease progression was defined as relative decline ⩾10% in FVC or ⩾15% in DLco from baseline. Serum KL-6 was measured using a full-automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (Fujirebio). Comparative logistic regression was used to identify predictors of progression at one year. 303 patients were included. 37% developed progression after one year from KL-6 measurement. A stepwise selection was used to identify and include five predictors of progression in a risk score: age, gender, BMI, FVC, and KL-6. The final model was superior to KL-6 alone to predict progression at one year, with 55% sensitivity, 73% specificity and 67% accuracy at a cut-off of 5. Patients were stratified in low and high risk of progression at one year based on the cut-off of 5, with a similar accuracy for IIP 0.687 and CTD-ILD 0.720 but not for HP. Serum KL-6 levels, included in a risk score with other clinical and functional variables, may help to better stratify patients for the risk of disease progression at one year, compared to any individual predictor.

Indexed as

BiomarkersLung Diseases, InterstitialMucin-1AgedDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersMUC1 protein, humanMucin-1BiomarkerILDProgressive phenotypeSerum KL-6

Identifiers

PMID41068354
PMCPMC12511299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.