Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068351›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Wet wipes from Citrus limon sanitizer and banana fiber nonwovens.

Kamalha Edwin, Kanene Levi Brian, Musinguzi Alex

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kamalha EdwinDepartment of Polymer, Textile and Industrial Engineering, Busitema University, Nagongera, Uganda.
Kanene Levi BrianDepartment of Polymer, Textile and Industrial Engineering, Busitema University, Nagongera, Uganda.
Musinguzi AlexDepartment of Polymer, Textile and Industrial Engineering, Busitema University, Nagongera, Uganda. malex.eng@busitema.ac.ug.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas sanitizing wipes are among the strategies for combatting COVID-19, there are growing concerns concerning their disposal, due to majority of them being made of non-biodegradable fibres. Additionally, majority of the sanitizing solutions used are associated with irritations and some are carcinogenic. In this study, banana wipes, impregnated with an organic antimicrobial formulation were developed to counter the unbiodegradable wipes made of synthetic fibres and impregnated with toxic antimicrobial formulations. A spunlaced non-woven fabric made from 100% banana fibres was impregnated with a commercial formulation containing essential oils from lemon, eucalyptus, cedar and orange. The impregnated banana fabric wipe exhibited antimicrobial activity against all tested bacterial strains, including Escherichia coli (both ATCC 25,922 and the wild strain), Staphylococcus aureus (both ATCC 25,923 and the wild strain), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (both ATCC 27,853 and the wild strain), with inhibition zones ranging from 10.00 ± 1.00 mm to 13.67 ± 1.16 mm, compared to the standard 14.00 mm. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the fabric showed that the tensile strength in the wet state increased by 4.29% and 20.41% in both the machine and cross directions respectively. Given that synthetic fibres are used in wipes to achieve a high wet tensile strength since most cellulosic fibres become weaker and disintegrate when wet, it can be concluded that banana fibres can be effectively used in wipes application given that they are biodegradable and are stronger when wet.

Indexed as

CitrusMusaTextilesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCOVID-19Escherichia coliHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOils, VolatilePseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsOils, VolatileBanana pseudo-stemBio-basedBiodegradabilityCOVID-19NonwovenPlant extractSanitizing wipes

Identifiers

PMID41068351
PMCPMC12511627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.