Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068346›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An intelligent flow measurement system based on pressure drop in straight pipeline: a deep learning approach.

Reza Shakarami, Mohamad Taghi Sadeghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Reza ShakaramiChemical Engineering College, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, Iran.
Mohamad Taghi SadeghiChemical Engineering College, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, Iran. sadeghi@iust.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow metering is an essential industrial requirement commonly provided by differential pressure flow meters that have an obstruction device, causing huge upstream pressure at higher flow rates. Thus, the present study measures the flow velocity based on the pressure drop in the straight pipeline without any restriction device. Since the physical equations cannot be explicitly solved for the velocity calculation from pressure drop data, and the Trial-and-Error (TAE) procedure is time-consuming and unreliable, the deep learning approach is employed to determine the flow velocity from pressure drop data. Darcy friction factor and pressure drop are calculated to a wide range of flow velocity, pipe diameter, pipe relative roughness, and fluid kinematic viscosity to generate more than 27,000 theoretical data for training and testing different deep neural networks such as FFNN (Feed Forward Neural Network), CNN (Convolutional Neural Network), LSTM (Long and Short-Term Memory), and RNN (Recurrent Neural Network). Statistical analysis proves the influence of input variables and justifies their selection. Models have been evaluated via experimental data that include large pipe diameters up to 10cm and different fluids such as water and heavy oils with a kinematic viscosity of 340 m

Indexed as

Deep learningFlow meteringFriction factorFriction pressure dropMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41068346
PMCPMC12511332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.