ArticleScientific reports2025
An intelligent flow measurement system based on pressure drop in straight pipeline: a deep learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flow metering is an essential industrial requirement commonly provided by differential pressure flow meters that have an obstruction device, causing huge upstream pressure at higher flow rates. Thus, the present study measures the flow velocity based on the pressure drop in the straight pipeline without any restriction device. Since the physical equations cannot be explicitly solved for the velocity calculation from pressure drop data, and the Trial-and-Error (TAE) procedure is time-consuming and unreliable, the deep learning approach is employed to determine the flow velocity from pressure drop data. Darcy friction factor and pressure drop are calculated to a wide range of flow velocity, pipe diameter, pipe relative roughness, and fluid kinematic viscosity to generate more than 27,000 theoretical data for training and testing different deep neural networks such as FFNN (Feed Forward Neural Network), CNN (Convolutional Neural Network), LSTM (Long and Short-Term Memory), and RNN (Recurrent Neural Network). Statistical analysis proves the influence of input variables and justifies their selection. Models have been evaluated via experimental data that include large pipe diameters up to 10cm and different fluids such as water and heavy oils with a kinematic viscosity of 340 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.