Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068308›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing encrypted HTTPS traffic classification based on stacked deep ensembles models.

Ahmed M Elshewey, Ahmed M Osman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed M ElsheweyDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Suez University, P.O.Box:43221, Suez, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-1920
Ahmed M OsmanDepartment of Information Systems, Faculty of Computers and Information, Suez University, P.O.Box:43221, Suez, Egypt. a.osman@suezuni.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of encrypted HTTPS traffic is a critical task for network management and security, where traditional port or payload-based methods are ineffective due to encryption and evolving traffic patterns. This study addresses the challenge using the public Kaggle dataset (145,671 flows, 88 features, six traffic categories: Download, Live Video, Music, Player, Upload, Website). An automated preprocessing pipeline is developed to detect the label column, normalize classes, perform a stratified 70/15/15 split into training, validation, and testing sets, and apply imbalance-aware weighting. Multiple deep learning architectures are benchmarked, including DNN, CNN, RNN, LSTM, and GRU, capturing different spatial and temporal patterns of traffic features. Experimental results show that CNN achieved the strongest single-model performance (Accuracy 0.9934, F1_macro 0.9912, ROC-AUC_macro 0.9999). To further improve robustness, a stacked ensemble meta-learner based on multinomial logistic regression was trained on model outputs, achieving state-of-the-art performance with Accuracy 0.9949, Precision_macro 0.9923, Recall_macro 0.9941, F1_macro 0.9932, and ROC-AUC_macro 0.9998. The framework also outputs confusion matrices, ROC curves, and learning curves for interpretability. To ensure reproducibility and practical use, the full codebase is publicly available on GitHub, providing researchers and practitioners with a deployment-ready pipeline for encrypted traffic analytics where ensemble learning surpasses individual models.

Indexed as

CNNCyber securityDeep learningDNNEncrypted trafficEnsemble learningHTTPS traffic classificationNetwork securityNetwork traffic classification

Identifiers

PMID41068308
PMCPMC12511608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.