Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068284›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multiple instance learning using pathology foundation models effectively predicts kidney disease diagnosis and clinical classification.

Yu Kurata, Imari Mimura, Satoshi Kodera, Hiroyuki Abe, Daisuke Yamada, Haruki Kume, Tetsuo Ushiku, Tetsuhiro Tanaka, Norihiko Takeda, Masaomi Nangaku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yu KurataDivision of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Imari MimuraDivision of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. imimura@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Satoshi KoderaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki AbeDepartment of Pathology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke YamadaDivision of Urology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruki KumeDivision of Urology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuo UshikuDepartment of Pathology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuhiro TanakaDepartment of Nephrology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Norihiko TakedaOrgan Pathophysiology Program, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaomi NangakuDivision of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

Funding

Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP) on "Integrated Health Care System" JPJ012425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently developed pathology foundation models, pretrained on large-scale pathology datasets, have demonstrated excellent performance in various downstream tasks. This study evaluated the utility of pathology foundation models combined with multiple instance learning (MIL) for kidney pathology analysis. We used 242 hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images (WSIs) from the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP) and Japan-Pathology Artificial Intelligence Diagnostics Project databases as the development cohort, comprising 47 healthy controls, 35 acute interstitial nephritis, and 160 diabetic kidney disease (DKD) slides. External validation was performed using 83 WSIs from the University of Tokyo Hospital. Pretrained pathology foundation models were utilized as patch encoders and compared with ImageNet-pretrained ResNet50. Using the extracted patch features, we trained MIL models to classify diagnoses. In internal validation, all foundation models outperformed ResNet50, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) over 0.980. In external validation, the performance of ResNet50 markedly dropped, which was in contrast to all foundation models. Visualization of attention heatmaps confirmed that foundation models accurately recognized diagnostically relevant structures. In overt proteinuria (albuminuria ≥ 300 mg/gCre or proteinuria ≥ 1000 mg/gCre) prediction task, foundation models also outperformed ResNet50. We successfully integrated pathology foundation models with MIL to achieve robust diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

Diabetic NephropathiesKidney DiseasesMachine LearningFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMultiple-Instance Learning AlgorithmsROC CurveArtificial intelligenceFoundation modelMultiple instance learningRenal pathology

Identifiers

PMID41068284
PMCPMC12511320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.