ArticleScientific reports2025
Multiple instance learning using pathology foundation models effectively predicts kidney disease diagnosis and clinical classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transforming nephrology through artificial intelligence: a state-of-the-art roadmap for clinical integration.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently developed pathology foundation models, pretrained on large-scale pathology datasets, have demonstrated excellent performance in various downstream tasks. This study evaluated the utility of pathology foundation models combined with multiple instance learning (MIL) for kidney pathology analysis. We used 242 hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images (WSIs) from the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP) and Japan-Pathology Artificial Intelligence Diagnostics Project databases as the development cohort, comprising 47 healthy controls, 35 acute interstitial nephritis, and 160 diabetic kidney disease (DKD) slides. External validation was performed using 83 WSIs from the University of Tokyo Hospital. Pretrained pathology foundation models were utilized as patch encoders and compared with ImageNet-pretrained ResNet50. Using the extracted patch features, we trained MIL models to classify diagnoses. In internal validation, all foundation models outperformed ResNet50, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) over 0.980. In external validation, the performance of ResNet50 markedly dropped, which was in contrast to all foundation models. Visualization of attention heatmaps confirmed that foundation models accurately recognized diagnostically relevant structures. In overt proteinuria (albuminuria ≥ 300 mg/gCre or proteinuria ≥ 1000 mg/gCre) prediction task, foundation models also outperformed ResNet50. We successfully integrated pathology foundation models with MIL to achieve robust diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.