ArticleScientific reports2025
DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analysis to characterize biodiversity of some freshwater fish species in Lake Nasser and River Nile.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A case study for application of DNA barcoding in identifying species of some imported frozen fish fillets in Egypt.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aims to provide an inventory of eight freshwater fish species that represent 6 families obtained from Lake Nasser and the River Nile using DNA barcoding, using analysis of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sequences. Fish samples were identified morphologically as Ctenopharyngodon idella, Oreochromis niloticus, Bagrus bajad, Sarotherodon galilaeus, Auchenoglanis occidentalis, Lates niloticus, Sardinella tawilis, and Coptodon zillii. COI gene was successfully amplified for using PCR, showing a readable fragment length of ~ 700 base pairs (bp). The obtained sequences were compared to GenBank and the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD). The GenBank and BOLD resulted in a total of 6 fish samples finding their best hits with similarity scores ranging from 99.29 to 100%. The average AT content (53.12%) was higher than the average GC content (46.88%) in the studied fish species. The minimum genetic Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) distance between species was 0.089 and the maximum distance was 0.313. According to phylogenetic tree analysis, the majority of fish species were grouped into monophyletic units. The current study confirms that DNA barcoding is a useful method to identify the vast majority of fish species in Lake Nasser and the River Nile. However, the morphological identification remains crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.