ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-assisted thermal analysis of propylene glycol nanofluid with dual flux and bioconvection over a Riga plate.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Numerical modeling of 2D sutterby fluid stagnation-point flow over a stretching surface using levenberg-marquardt backpropagation.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Radiative heat transfer and entropy generation in MHD Williamson hybrid nanofluid flow over a Darcy-Forchheimer medium with heat source.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Xue model exploration for oxytactic microbes in radiative MHD hybrid nanoliquid using machine learning technique.Discover nano · 2026Article
- A deep neural network model for heat transfer in darcy-forchheimer hybrid nanofluid flow with activation energy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Statistical analysis for heat transfer optimization of magnetohydrodynamics trihybrid nanofluid over a convectively heated Riga surface.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study investigates the behavior of non-Newtonian nanofluids with Cattaneo-Christov dual flux by using various effects of different physical parameters over a Riga plate. Nanoparticles significantly increase the heat transfer rate and serve as powerful tools for improving energy storage devices and solar thermal systems. The novelty of the current research study is the mixing of copper nanoparticles (Cu) in the propylene glycol. (C₃H₈O₂) has highly thermodynamic properties. The main objective of the present analysis is to enhance the rate of heat and mass transfer in the nanofluid. Therefore, the Cattaneo-Christov model was used in the heat and mass equations to increase the heat transfer rate of the fluid model. The PDE system of the problem is converted into an ODE system using suitable transformations. The solution to the mathematical problem was obtained by applying the bvp4c technique of MATLAB. The graphical results represent the physical properties of the nanofluid, including the bioconvection, concentration, temperature, and velocity profiles. Furthermore, tables were used to compute the numerical values of motile microorganisms, Sherwood number, Nusselt number, and skin friction coefficient. Boosting the parameters, such as the modified Hartmann number, buoyancy ratio, and Rayleigh number, of bio-convection increases the velocity profile. The temperature profile increased as the thermophoresis parameter, heat relaxation time parameter, and Eckert number increased. Additionally, this study uses an intelligent numerical computing method known as MLFF, which is based on ANN. These artificial neural networks are used to optimize physical quantities and verify the accuracy of data by training, validation, and testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.