ArticleScientific reports2025
Characterizing the spatial structures of competing football teams.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Progress in football analytics is hampered by two main reasons: the unavailability of detailed datasets; and a dearth of meaningful metrics that would aid in gaining insight into the collective action of teams. We analyzed a dataset consisting of the full trajectories of all players, from twelve complete matches from three major international tournaments. We studied the teams' spatial structure, a topic that has been, to date, relatively unexplored. What has typically been analyzed is the teams' convex hull which gives a measure for the overall spread of the team in space, but which ignores the contributions of the players that are within it. Here we computed, for the first time, also the convex hull of those interior players. We then calculated the ratio of the area of the inner convex hull over the area of the outer convex hull, which gives us a single number that encapsulates the geometry of a team for a given point in time. We find a relatively general pattern-the ratio of the areas of these two convex layers almost always dies out at ~ 0.5 (i.e., there are almost no cases where the area of the inner layer exceeds 50% of the area of the outer layer). This result proves to be robust: for instance, it appears in both attacking and defending layouts (which are typically associated with very different team spatial structures). While it remains unclear whether a layer ratio value outside the observed range has practical implications, our findings provide a foundation for future research into the spatial geometry of team sports and its potential strategic relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.