ArticleScientific reports2025
Newly validated touch experiences and attitudes questionnaire in German (TEAQ-G) is linked to social functioning, mental health, and hormonal stress regulation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpersonal affectionate touch plays a crucial role in social bonding, stress regulation, and psychological well-being. However, individual differences in past touch experiences and attitudes toward touch remain understudied. This study aimed to validate the German version of the touch experiences and attitudes questionnaire (TEAQ-G) and investigate how the subscales childhood touch experiences, current intimate touch, and attitudes toward touch relate to social relationships, mental health, emotional states, cortisol and oxytocin levels in everyday life. Data from 1,319 study participants suggest good psychometric properties of the TEAQ-G, confirming its reliability and validity as a tool for assessing touch experiences and attitudes. Regression analyses revealed that retrospectively reported more positive childhood touch and current intimate touch were associated with lower levels of attachment avoidance, stress, anxiety, depression, and loneliness, as well as higher resilience, family functioning, and relationship satisfaction. These findings were further supported by ecological momentary assessment data from 253 subjects (6 measures à two days, resulting in 3036 data points), associating positive childhood touch experiences with more favorable daily emotional states in adulthood. Specifically, individuals reported lower levels of stress, anxiety, loneliness, and burden related to the COVID-19 pandemic, along with increased happiness. Similarly, current intimate touch was linked to lower stress, pandemic-related burden, reduced loneliness, higher happiness, and moderately higher salivary oxytocin levels. Moreover, both childhood touch experiences and attitudes toward intimate touch significantly moderated the relationship between daily affectionate touch reports and individuals' happiness, stress levels, pandemic-related burden, and cortisol concentrations. Our results emphasize the developmental importance of early touch experiences and highlight the lasting impact of both early and ongoing touch on attachment, social relationships, psychological well-being, and hormonal responses in everyday life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.