ArticleScientific reports2025
A 2-dimension linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy decision-making method with application to unmanned aerial vehicle contribution assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing the contribution of an unmanned aerial vehicle to the effectiveness of a swarm is a challenging problem, as it depends heavily on expert judgments that are often subjective, imprecise, and expressed with varying levels of confidence. Existing decision-making methods can capture evaluative uncertainty but generally fail to represent the reliability of those evaluations within a unified framework. To address this gap, this study introduces a 2-dimension linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy variable, which simultaneously represents an expert's linguistic evaluation and the confidence attached to that evaluation under the Pythagorean fuzzy condition. The fundamental operational rules, score and accuracy functions, and aggregation operators for 2-dimension linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy variables are developed, and their algebraic properties are formally established. Building on this representation, a multi-criteria decision-making method is proposed for unmanned aerial vehicle contribution assessment. A practical case study demonstrates that the method produces results that are consistent with established approaches, strongly correlated in ranking performance, and sensitive to differences in expert confidence, thereby providing both reliability and interpretability. Nevertheless, the current study assumes fixed linguistic term sets and a static confidence dimension, and the case study is limited to a small number of evaluation criteria. Future research will address calibration of linguistic scales, dynamic updating of confidence, and broader validation across domains. Overall, the proposed approach offers a structured and reliable tool for evaluating unmanned aerial vehicle contributions in swarm operations and enriches the methodological foundations for decision-making under uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.