ArticleScientific reports2025
Nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota profiling in SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variations have been found in the upper respiratory tract microbiota in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients compared to healthy subjects, with different dominant species and diversity indexes detected, including a decrease in biodiversity and an increased abundance of bacterial pathogens. Moreover, these discrepancies were observed in patients with both mild and severe symptoms. Notably, the inflammatory state appears to be significantly influenced by the characteristics of the indigenous microbiota. This is particularly interesting in pregnant patients, as pregnancy involves an adaptive adjustment of the microbiota due to hormonal changes aimed at providing immune protection. The relationship between the microbiota of pregnant women and SARS-CoV-2 has not been deeply explored so far. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2, nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota, and pregnancy. To our knowledge this is the first simultaneous investigation on both nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota in SARS-Cov-2 infected pregnant women. In this study, the nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota were analysed in 43 women in their third trimester of pregnancy enrolled from April 2020 to February 2021. The differential abundance of taxa was tested and alpha and beta diversity were evaluated. SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women showed an alteration of the nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota compared to healthy pregnant women. In both the nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota of the SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women, we found a variation in taxa, represented by an enrichment of pathobionts, which increased particularly with the severity of symptoms. Specifically, a significant reduction in microbial biodiversity has been identified within the nasopharyngeal microbiota of SARS-CoV-2 positive women. Furthermore, enrichment in pathobionts was noted in both asymptomatic and symptomatic women, with these changes being more pronounced in the nasopharyngeal microbiota compared to the oral one. The nasopharyngeal microbiota of asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected women showed an enrichment of pathogens and pathobionts such as Corynebacterium, Fusobacterium, Neisseria, Streptococcus, Haemophilus, Mycobacterium and Porphyromonas compared with the control group. The oral microbiota showed an enrichment of pathobionts such as Neisseria, Fusobacterium and Streptococcus. A random forest classifier applied to metagenomic data from nasopharyngeal and oral swabs showed that the nasopharyngeal microbiota is the best sampling site to predict the patients' SARS-CoV-2 infection status. Gulbenkiania, Burkholderia and Actinomyces, all taxa significantly enriched in the control group compared to SARS-CoV-2 infected women, were the most important features selected by the classifier. Finally, correlations between the nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota and clinical parameters of pregnant women, particularly BMI and procalcitonin, were observed. SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women showed an alteration of the nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota compared to healthy pregnant women. We found a variation in taxa, represented by the enrichment of pathobionts in both the nasopharyngeal and oral microbiota of SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women, particularly increased in symptomatic individuals. The nasopharyngeal microbiota appears to be a better predictor of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity than the oral microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.