Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41068230›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A generalized three-tier hybrid model for classifying unseen (IoT devices) in smart home environments.

Quadri Waseem, Wan Isni Sofiah Wan Din, Muhammad Aamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Quadri WaseemFaculty of Computing, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Pekan, Pahang, 26600, Malaysia.
Wan Isni Sofiah Wan DinFaculty of Computing, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Pekan, Pahang, 26600, Malaysia. sofiah@umpsa.edu.my.
Muhammad AamirDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, OX1 3QD, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Universiti Malaysia Pahang-Al Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA),FRGS FRGS/1/2023/ICT02/UMP/02/7 and RDU Grant no: RDU230144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data drift caused due to network changes, new device additions, or model degradation alters the patterns learned by ML/DL models, resulting in poor classification performance. This creates the need for a generalized, drift-resilient model that can learn without retraining in dynamic environments. To maintain high accuracy, such a model must classify previously unseen IoT devices effectively. In this study, we propose a three-tier incremental architecture (CNN-PN-RF) combining Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for feature extraction, Prototypical Network (PN) for class embedding, and Random Forest (RF) for robust classification. The model utilizes six aggregated diverse IoT datasets.Two similarly structured datasets (Dataset 1 and Dataset 2) were created from it, differing in training-testing splits, with some device CSV files withheld to test on unseen classification. Phase 1 employs a stand-alone CNN-based model with L2 regularization, dropout, and early stopping, achieving 70.96% accuracy. Phase 2 integrates CNN with RF, using SMOTE for class balancing and PCA for dimensionality reduction, attaining 83.79% accuracy. Phase 3 introduces PN to finalize the CNN-PN-RF model, enhancing classification issue of feature clustering, intra-class separability, and small-class support. Final accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were 99.56%, 99.66%, 99.56%, and 99.59% for Dataset 1, and 99.80% for all metrics on Dataset 2. The model was compared with state-of-the-art approaches and validated on unseen IoT subsets of both datasets, showing better generalization capability.

Indexed as

ClassificationCNNData DriftPrototypical networksRFUnseen IoT devices

Identifiers

PMID41068230
PMCPMC12511639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.