Observational studyScientific reports2025
Triglyceride-glucose index predicts the mortality risk among incident peritoneal dialysis patients in a cohort study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bile acids as a predictor for all-cause mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Association between triglyceride-glucose index-a body shape index and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and the modification effect of dietary patterns.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insulin resistance (IR) frequently cause higher levels of fasting glucose and triglyceride. Triglyceride- glucose (TyG) index has been suggested as a simple, reliable, and cost-effective surrogate for IR. We conducted the present study to assess whether TyG index is associated with increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality among our PD cohort. This observational study included 553 patients initiating PD between 2003 and 2017 who were divided into three groups by TyG tertiles. The study exposure was the TyG index at study enrollment. Associations of TyG index with patient mortality were examined in Cox models and the potential confounding covariates included medication use, demographic, comorbidities, PD-associated and laboratory data. The optimal cut-off points of TyG index were also determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and area under ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. During follow-up, 142 patients died, of whom 89 CV deaths occurred. The risks of all-cause and CV mortality increased with tertiles of TyG index. In the multivariable-adjusted models, the hazard ratios (HRs) in tertile 3 versus tertile 1 were 2.12 (95% CI 1.31-3.43, p = 0.021) and 2.78 (95% CI 1.34-5.76, p = 0.006) for all-cause and CV mortality, respectively. Those independent associations remained even when TyG index was treated as a continuous variable, or per 1-standard deviation increase. The cut-off point of TyG index was 8.79 (62.7% sensitivity and 61.6% specificity) with AUC of 0.652 and 8.85 (66.3% sensitivity and 62.9% specificity) with AUC of 0.681 for all-cause and CV mortality, respectively. Elevated levels of TyG index significantly predicted increased risks of all-cause and CV mortality in patients initiating PD. More studies are required to compare with other surrogates of insulin sensitivity and extrapolated to other ethnic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.