ArticleScientific reports2025
High-throughput screening and characterization of novel inhibitors targeting HIV-1 protease precursor autoprocessing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV-1 protease (PR) is initially synthesized as part of the Gag-Pol polyprotein precursor, which undergoes temporospatially regulated autoprocessing to liberate mature PR. The free mature enzyme is the target of currently available protease inhibitors (PIs). To explore alternative therapeutic strategies, we developed a cell-based high-throughput screening (HTS) platform targeting precursor autoprocessing, screened approximately 320,000 small molecules, and identified 27 compounds that partially suppress precursor autoprocessing. A highly sensitive infectivity assay confirmed that several compounds inhibited viral infectivity in a dose-dependent manner, with EC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.